Saturday 16 March 2013

Andrew Stephens accuses Ms. Beverly of being a terrorist

Andrew, in his usual "charming" manner, decides to impersonate Ms. Ickes while posting from his stephensboy@gmail account. He's trying to get Richard Morton Scoville, the serial libeler, to fight his battles for him. What a coward!


From  <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136117992500>

 On Sunday, February 17, 2013 1:13:26 PM UTC-5, BEI Design wrote: > Exactly as Susan was several months ago when she made a > > similar attempt, you have been hustled by a smooth-talking > > charlatan. I am really sorry your effort failed, but fail > > it did. Beverly Ickes, your opinion of me is based on a void. That means that you speak of ignorance. That means you CHOOSE to speak out of ignorance. That means you are IGNORANT!!! PS. Scoville, are you sure that Beverly Ickes of Oregon is not a Cougar Pedo? You may want to check on that, she is certainly in support of terrorism, so being a Pedo wouldn't be far fetched. Hmmm? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Left intact to archive on google. Andrew wrote: "...Beverly Ickes of Oregon [...] is certainly in support of terrorism, ..." ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Andrew Jacob Stephens wants to commit libel?

Andrew, posting as Game Over from his edataking@gmail account, decides that he will side with the serial libeler Rick Scoville. Proof?, what's that!

From  <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136110401400>

Since there seems to be little regard in this group for truth-telling, I am=
 done spending time researching what is true and what is not.  I can presum=
e that everything Rick Scoville says is TRUE unless is is disputed with har=
d evidence to the contrary.  I believe his posts until proven otherwise and=
 will gladly re-post them all over the web in hopes that his words resonate=
 in the ears and eyes of those that are doing initial research.

Send me the screed Rick and I'll have my "socks" go to work!

Andrew Jacob Stephens tries to lie is way out of trouble

Posting as Neo, Andrew tries to avoid the question as to why he used his edataking account at Vimeo to show two disgusting videos. Hardly the sort of thing that a God fearing Pastor would be associated with!
On Saturday, February 9, 2013 10:41:53 AM UTC-5, MTA admin wrote:
> Why the edataking logo burned in to the video then?
After seeing a screenshot of this alleged evidence, it is clear that there is no edataking watermark.  In fact, someone has simply created a Vimeo account and uploaded the edataking image to their profile.  Probably another character assassination move by one of your group.  No one else would do such a thing.


http://usenetharvested.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/ss_01_feb_2013_vim...

<http://usenetharvested.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/ss_01_feb_2013_vimeo_grossoutvideos_cakefart.png>